Question

Statement: Should system of offering jobs only to the wards of government employees be introduced in all government offices in India?
Arguments:

I. No. It denies opportunity to many deserving individuals and government may stand to lose in the long run.
II. No. It is against the principle of equality, does not government owe its responsibility to all its citizens?

a.

Only argument I is strong

b.

Only argument II is strong

c.

Either I or II is strong

d.

Both I and II are strong

Posted under Logical Reasoning

Answer: (d).Both I and II are strong

Interact with the Community - Share Your Thoughts

Uncertain About the Answer? Seek Clarification Here.

Understand the Explanation? Include it Here.

Q. Statement: Should system of offering jobs only to the wards of government employees be introduced in all government offices in India? Arguments: I. No. It denies opportunity to...

Similar Questions

Explore Relevant Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)

Q. Statement: Should the vehicles older than 15 years be rejected in metros in India?
Arguments:

I. Yes. This is a significant step to lower down the pollution level in metros.
II. No. It will be very difficult for vehicle owners to shift to other parts in country because they will not get suitable job for their very existence.

Q. Statement: Should the tuition fees in all post-graduate courses be hiked considerably?
Arguments:

I. Yes. This will bring in some sense of seriousness among the students and will improve the quality.
II. No. This will force the meritorious poor students to stay away from post-graduate courses.

Q. Statement: Should the persons below the age of 18 years be allowed to join armed forces?
Arguments:

I. No. Persons below the age of 18 do not attain both physical and mental maturity to shoulder such burden.
II. Yes. This will help the country develop its armed forces which will serve the country for a longer time.

Q. Statement: Should all the infrastructural development projects in India be handed over to the private sector?
Arguments:

I. No. The private sector entities are hot equipped to handle such projects.
II. Yes. Such projects are handled by private sector in the developed countries.

Q. Statement: Should all the colleges in India be allowed to devise their own curriculum and syllabus for the vocational courses promoting self-employment?
Arguments:

I. Yes. This is an important step to generate employment opportunities.
II. No. This will affect the quality of education due to lack of uniformity in syllabus.

Q. Statement: Should agriculture in rural India be mechanized?
Arguments:

I. Yes. It would lead to higher production.
II. No. Many villagers would be left unemployed.

Q. Statement: Should girls learn arts like judo and karate?
Arguments:

I. Yes. It will enable them to defend themselves from rogues and ruffians.
II. No. They will lose their feminine grace.

Q. Statement: Should India develop a national water grid by connecting all the rivers in the country?
Arguments:

I. No. This is not just possible as we do not have the technical knowhow.
II. Yes, this will greatly help the entire country by effectively channelizing the excess water to the areas having shortage.

Q. Statement: Should individuals/institutes having treasures of national significance like Nobel Prizes, hand them over to the Central Government for their safe custody?
Arguments:

I. Yes. The individuals or institutions do not have enough resources to protect them.
II. No. These are the property of the individuals/institutions who win them and should be in their custody.

Q. Statement: Should there be reservation of seats and posts on communal basis?
Arguments:

I. Yes. It will check most of the inter-communal biases.
II. No, ours is a secular state.

Q. Statement: Should octroi be abolished?
Arguments:

I. Yes. It will eliminate an important source of corruption.
II. No. It will adversely affect government revenues.

Q. Statement: Should persons convicted of criminal offences in the past be allowed to contest elections in India?
Arguments:

I. No. Such persons cannot serve the cause of the people and country.
II. Yes. It is democracy - let people decide whom to vote.

Q. Statement: Should officers accepting bribe be punished?
Arguments:

I. No. Certain circumstances may have compelled them to take bribe.
II. Yes. They should do the job they are entrusted with, honestly.

Q. Statement: Should there be a complete ban on use of all types of chemical pesticides in India?
Arguments:

I. No. The pests will destroy all the crops and the farmers will have nothing to harvest.
II. Yes. The chemical pesticides used in agriculture pollute the water underground and this has become a serious health hazard.

Q. Statement: Should cutting of trees be banned altogether?
Arguments:

I. Yes. It is very much necessary to do so to restore ecological balance.
II. No. A total ban would harm timber based industries.

Q. Statement: Should there be a restriction on the migration of people from one state to another state in India?
Arguments:

I. No. Any Indian citizen has a basic right to stay at any place of his/her choice and hence they cannot be stopped.
II. Yes. This is the way to effect an equitable distribution of resources across the states in India.

Q. Statement: Should public holidays be declared on demise of important national leaders?
Arguments:

I. No. Such unscheduled holidays hamper national progress.
II. Yes. People would like to pay their homage to the departed soul.

Q. Statement: Should India support all the international policies of United States of America?
Arguments:

I. No. Many other powerful countries do not support the same.
II. Yes. This is the only way to gain access to USA developmental funds.

Q. Statement: Should words like 'Smoking is injurious to health essentially appear on cigarette packs?
Arguments:

I. Yes. It is a sort of brainwash to make the smokers realize that they are inhaling poisonous stuff.
II. No. It hampers the enjoyment of smoking.

Q. Statement: Should the council of ministers once appointed be kept the same for the entire period intervening two elections?
Arguments:

I. No. Shuffling of ministers and portfolios is a healthy democratic process.
II. Yes. The ministers do not get a hold on their portfolio unless they are kept for a longer duration.

Recommended Subjects

Are you eager to expand your knowledge beyond Logical Reasoning? We've handpicked a range of related categories that you might find intriguing.

Click on the categories below to discover a wealth of MCQs and enrich your understanding of various subjects. Happy exploring!