Q. Statement: Can pollution be controlled?
Arguments:

I. Yes. If everyone realizes the hazards it may create and cooperates to get rid of it, pollution may be controlled.
II. No. The crowded highways, factories and industries and an ever-growing population eager to acquire more and more land for constructing houses are beyond control.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?
Arguments:

I. Yes. This is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better services to the public.
II. No. This will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should internal assessment in colleges be abolished?
Arguments:

I. Yes. This will help in reducing the possibility of favouritism.
II. No, teaching faculty will lose control over students.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should children be legally made responsible to take care of their parents during their old age?
Arguments:

I. Yes. Such matter can only be solved by legal means.
II. Yes. Only this will bring some relief to poor parents.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should there be reservation in Government jobs for candidates from single child family?
Arguments:

I. No. This is not advisable as the jobs should be offered to only deserving candidates without any reservation for a particular group.
II. Yes. This will help reduce the growing population in India as the parents will be encouraged to adopt single child norm.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should higher education be completely stopped for some time?
Arguments:

I. No. It will hamper the country's future progress.
II. Yes. It will reduce the educated unemployment.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should we scrap the 'Public Distribution System' in India?
Arguments:

I. Yes, Protectionism is over, everyone must get the bread on his/her own.
II. Yes. The poor do not get any benefit because of corruption.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should India have no military force at all?
Arguments:

I. No. Other countries in the world do not believe in non-violence.
II. Yes. Many Indians believe in non-violence.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should there be uniforms for students in the colleges in India as in the schools?
Arguments:

I. Yes, this will improve the ambience of the colleges as all the students will be decently dressed.
II. No. The college students should not be regimented and they should be left to choose their clothes for coming to the college.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should India engage into a dialogue with neighbouring countries to stop cross border tension?
Arguments:

I. Yes. This is the only way to reduce the cross border terrorism and stop loss of innocent lives.
II. No. Neighbouring countries cannot be relied upon in such matters, they may still engage in subversive activities.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should there be a world government?
Arguments:

I. Yes. It will help in eliminating tensions among the nations.
II. No. Then, only the developed countries will dominate in the government.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should the practice of transfers of clerical cadre employees from government offices of one city to those of another be stopped?
Arguments:

I. No. Transfer of employees is a routine administrative matter and we must continue it.
II. Yes. It involves lot of governmental expenditure and inconvenience too many compared to the benefits it yields.

View solution

Q. Statement: Is paying ransom or agreeing to the conditions of kidnappers of political figures, a proper course of action?
Arguments:

I. Yes. The victims must be saved at all cost.
II. No. It encourages the kidnappers to continue their sinister activities.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should government jobs in rural areas have more incentives?
Arguments:

I. Yes. Incentives are essential for attracting government servants there.
II. No. Rural areas are already cheaper, healthier and less complex than big cities. So ? Why offer extra incentives!

View solution

Q. Statement: Should there be a cap on maximum number of contestants for parliamentary elections in any constituency?
Arguments:

I. Yes. This will make the parliamentary elections more meaningful as the voters can make a considered judgement for casting their vote.
II. No. In a democracy any person fulfilling the eligibility criteria can contest parliamentary elections and there should be no restrictions.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should so much money be spent on advertisements?
Arguments:

I. Yes. It is an essential concomitant in a capitalist economy.
II. No. It leads to wastage of resources.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should all the legislators be forced to resign from their profession?
Arguments:

I. Yes. They will be able to devote more time for the country.
II. No, nobody will contest election.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should 'computer knowledge' be made a compulsory subject for all the students at secondary school level?
Arguments:

I. No, our need is 'bread' for everyone, we cannot follow western models.
II. Yes. We cannot compete in the international market without equipping our children with computers.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should India encourage exports, when most things are insufficient for internal use itself?
Arguments:

I. Yes. We have to earn foreign exchange to pay for our imports.
II. No. Even selective encouragement would lead to shortages.

View solution

Q. Statement: Should all the drugs patented and manufactured in Western countries be first tried out on sample basis before giving licence for sale to general public in India?
Arguments:

I. Yes. Many such drugs require different doses and duration for Indian population and hence it is necessary.
II. No. This is just not feasible and hence cannot be implemented.

View solution