Life Underwriting Principles and Concepts Part 2 MCQs

Welcome to our comprehensive collection of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) on Life Underwriting Principles and Concepts Part 2, a fundamental topic in the field of IC22 Life Insurance Underwriting. Whether you're preparing for competitive exams, honing your problem-solving skills, or simply looking to enhance your abilities in this field, our Life Underwriting Principles and Concepts Part 2 MCQs are designed to help you grasp the core concepts and excel in solving problems.

In this section, you'll find a wide range of Life Underwriting Principles and Concepts Part 2 mcq questions that explore various aspects of Life Underwriting Principles and Concepts Part 2 problems. Each MCQ is crafted to challenge your understanding of Life Underwriting Principles and Concepts Part 2 principles, enabling you to refine your problem-solving techniques. Whether you're a student aiming to ace IC22 Life Insurance Underwriting tests, a job seeker preparing for interviews, or someone simply interested in sharpening their skills, our Life Underwriting Principles and Concepts Part 2 MCQs are your pathway to success in mastering this essential IC22 Life Insurance Underwriting topic.

Note: Each of the following question comes with multiple answer choices. Select the most appropriate option and test your understanding of Life Underwriting Principles and Concepts Part 2. You can click on an option to test your knowledge before viewing the solution for a MCQ. Happy learning!

So, are you ready to put your Life Underwriting Principles and Concepts Part 2 knowledge to the test? Let's get started with our carefully curated MCQs!

Life Underwriting Principles and Concepts Part 2 MCQs | Page 6 of 14

Q51.
How is an individual categorized if their assessment value is more than 125% in the risk classification process?
Discuss
Answer: (c).Highly sub-standard risk Explanation:If an individual's assessment value is more than 125%, they will be categorized as highly sub-standard risk.
Discuss
Answer: (b).They are likely to face double the mortality risk of an individual accepted on standard terms Explanation:An individual having an extra mortality rating of 100% implies that they are likely to face double the mortality risk of an individual who has been accepted on standard terms.
Discuss
Answer: (c).The combination effect of unfavourable factors may give a much higher extra mortality rate than individual unfavourable factors Explanation:The combination effect of unfavourable factors may give a much higher extra mortality rate than individual unfavourable factors.
Discuss
Answer: (b).The combined effect of all unfavourable factors is calculated, which may give a much higher extra mortality rate Explanation:When an individual has multiple unfavourable factors, the combined effect of these factors needs to be considered cautiously in underwriting. The total of the individual unfavourable factors that are considered in isolation may not give true results; a combination effect of these factors may give a much higher extra mortality rate than for the individual unfavourable/adverse factors.
Discuss
Answer: (a).An additional rating for the combined effect of unfavourable factors in an individual Explanation:The "combination factor" refers to an additional rating for the combined effect of unfavourable factors in an individual. When multiple unfavourable factors co-exist, the combined effect may increase the mortality rate manifold, hence the additional rating is required to classify the extra risk appropriately.
Discuss
Answer: (d).All of the above. Explanation:Multiple advantages of the numerical rating system in underwriting, including eliminating personal judgment of underwriters, assessing the combined effect of multiple adverse factors, and increasing speed and efficiency in handling large volumes of business.
Q57.
Why is charging a level extra premium for substandard lives throughout the term of the policy contract considered unfair for some individuals?
Discuss
Answer: (a).They may have a category of extra-risk that diminishes over time. Explanation:Charging a level extra premium for substandard lives throughout the term of the policy contract is unfair for individuals whose category of extra-risk is of decreasing type, meaning their extra risk diminishes over time.
Discuss
Answer: (c).A temporary extra premium imposed for a short period along with the normal extra mortality rating. Explanation:A temporary extra is imposed for a short period along with the normal extra mortality rating when charging for the extra risk in the initial years of the policy but which decreases with the passage of time.
Discuss
Answer: (a).It does not account for the effect of the presence of co-morbidity factors. Explanation:The numerical rating system, while helpful in the risk assessment of individual impairments, does not account for the effect of the presence of co-morbidity factors, which is a limitation.
Discuss
Answer: (c).It impacts their risk profile to a large extent Explanation:The occupation of an individual can impact their risk profile to a large extent.
Page 6 of 14