Statement and Argument MCQs
Welcome to our comprehensive collection of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) on Statement and Argument, a fundamental topic in the field of Logical Reasoning. Whether you're preparing for competitive exams, honing your problem-solving skills, or simply looking to enhance your abilities in this field, our Statement and Argument MCQs are designed to help you grasp the core concepts and excel in solving problems.
In this section, you'll find a wide range of Statement and Argument mcq questions that explore various aspects of Statement and Argument problems. Each MCQ is crafted to challenge your understanding of Statement and Argument principles, enabling you to refine your problem-solving techniques. Whether you're a student aiming to ace Logical Reasoning tests, a job seeker preparing for interviews, or someone simply interested in sharpening their skills, our Statement and Argument MCQs are your pathway to success in mastering this essential Logical Reasoning topic.
Note: Each of the following question comes with multiple answer choices. Select the most appropriate option and test your understanding of Statement and Argument. You can click on an option to test your knowledge before viewing the solution for a MCQ. Happy learning!
So, are you ready to put your Statement and Argument knowledge to the test? Let's get started with our carefully curated MCQs!
Statement and Argument MCQs | Page 12 of 15
Discover more Topics under Logical Reasoning
Arguments:
I. No. This will enhance wastage of money and resources.
II. Yes. This will help the voters to change non-performing representatives without much delay.
III. No. The elected representatives will not have enough time to settle and concentrate on developmental activities.
Arguments:
I. Yes. Our government employees are having the maximum number of holidays among the countries of the world.
II. Yes. It is a sign of British legacy, why should we carry it further?
III. Yes. It will speed up work and all the pending jobs can be completed well in time.
IV. No. Employees must be given ample spare time to spend with their family.
Arguments:
I. Yes. This will motivate the children to study and get higher marks, and thus more knowledge can be imbibed at a younger age.
II. No. The children will be forced to study and won't enjoy the process.
III. Yes. In today's competitive world the children need to be prepared right from the beginning to face such difficult examinations.
IV. No. This will add pressure on tender aged children and leave very little time for them to play.
Arguments:
I. Yes. It is a rule and rules should be followed strictly by all.
II. No. Each individual knows how to protect his own life and it should be left to his discretion.
III. No. It does not ensure safety as only the head is protected and rest of the body is not.
IV. Yes. It is a necessity as head, being the most sensitive organ, is protected by the helmet.
Arguments:
I. No. It is not correct to prevent matured youngsters above 18 years of age who can vote, from having fun.
II. Yes. The entry fee to such pubs should also be hiked.
III. No. There is no such curb in western countries.
IV. Yes. This will help in preventing youngsters from getting into bad company and imbibing bad habits.
Arguments:
I. Yes. This is the only way to teach discipline to the employees.
II. No. Government cannot deprive its citizens of their basic rights.
III. Yes. This is the only way to ensure maximum productivity without disruption of work.
Arguments:
I. No. We get vital information regarding education through television.
II. Yes. It hampers the study of children.
III. Yes. Young children are misguided by certain programmes featuring sex and violence.
IV. No. This is the only way to educate the masses.
Arguments:
I. No. Nobody should be allowed to end his/her life at his/her will as this goes against the basic tenets of humanity.
II. Yes. Patients undergoing terrible suffering and having absolutely no chance of recovery should be liberated from suffering through mercy death.
III. No. Even mercy death is a sort of killing and killing can never be legalized.
Arguments:
I. No. It would be an injustice to those juniors who are more deserving and suitable for higher positions than their senior counterparts.
II. Yes. Otherwise senior employees do feel humiliated.
III. Yes. Senior employees are more experienced and must be rewarded for the same.
Arguments:
I. Yes. It will be beneficial for those candidates who are unable to bear the expenses of entrance tests.
II. Yes. Many deserving candidates securing high marks in their qualifying academic examinations do not perform well on such entrance tests.
III. No. The standard of examinations and assessment conducted by different Boards and universities are not comparable and hence there is a need to conduct entrance tests to calibrate them on a common yardstick.