Statement and Argument MCQs
Welcome to our comprehensive collection of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) on Statement and Argument, a fundamental topic in the field of Logical Reasoning. Whether you're preparing for competitive exams, honing your problem-solving skills, or simply looking to enhance your abilities in this field, our Statement and Argument MCQs are designed to help you grasp the core concepts and excel in solving problems.
In this section, you'll find a wide range of Statement and Argument mcq questions that explore various aspects of Statement and Argument problems. Each MCQ is crafted to challenge your understanding of Statement and Argument principles, enabling you to refine your problem-solving techniques. Whether you're a student aiming to ace Logical Reasoning tests, a job seeker preparing for interviews, or someone simply interested in sharpening their skills, our Statement and Argument MCQs are your pathway to success in mastering this essential Logical Reasoning topic.
Note: Each of the following question comes with multiple answer choices. Select the most appropriate option and test your understanding of Statement and Argument. You can click on an option to test your knowledge before viewing the solution for a MCQ. Happy learning!
So, are you ready to put your Statement and Argument knowledge to the test? Let's get started with our carefully curated MCQs!
Statement and Argument MCQs | Page 13 of 15
Discover more Topics under Logical Reasoning
Arguments:
I. Yes. This would give more opportunities of development to the weaker sections of the society and thus help reduce the gap between the affluent and the downtrodden in India.
II. No. The private sector does not get any government assistance and therefore they should not be saddled with such policies.
III. No. Nowhere else in the world such a practice is being followed.
IV. No. The management of the private sector undertaking would not agree to such compulsions.
Arguments:
I. Yes. It is the present management theory.
II. No. Many workers are illiterate and so their contributions will not be of any value.
III. Yes. Employees-owned companies generally have higher productivity.
IV. No. Employee-union ownership drives up salaries and wages.
Arguments:
I. Yes. They are equally capable.
II. No. They have to shoulder household responsibilities.
III. Yes. They should also go into the outside world.
Arguments:
I. Yes. Privatization will make these institutes financially healthy, competitive and quality conscious.
II. Yes. Privatization is the key of the new era - can we survive without it?
III. No. Standard of education of these institutes will fall.
Arguments:
I. Yes. They get friendly with local people and are manipulated by them.
II. No. By the time their policies and schemes start taking shape, they have to leave.
III. No. This will create a lot of administrative hassles and cause a lot of inconvenience to the officers.
Arguments:
I. Yes. This is the only way to reduce the risk of exposing people to some diseases.
II. No. Each individual should have right to choose what he wants.
III. No. There is no confirmed evidence that such products have adverse effects on human body.
IV Yes. It is banned in many other countries also.
Arguments:
I. Yes. The students are the best judge of their capabilities and there should not be restrictions for joining post-graduate courses.
II. No. The students need to study relevant subjects in graduate courses to enrol in post-graduate courses and the students must fulfil such conditions.
III. No. There are not enough institutes offering post-graduate courses which can accommodate all the graduates desirous of seeking post-graduate education of their own choice.
Arguments:
I. Yes. All the progressive nations do so.
II. No. We cannot impart it in co-educational schools.
III. Yes. It would certainly help in eradicating the existing misunderstanding and make the younger generation physically and mentally healthier.
IV. It will destroy the moral fibre and the highly esteemed value system which we have inherited from our forefathers.
Arguments:
I. Yes. Coal engines cause a lot of pollution.
II. Yes. Electric engines are good on performance, easy to operate and low on maintenance.
III. No. India does not produce enough electricity to fulfil its domestic needs also.
Arguments:
I. No. The death penalty should be given only in very rare and exceptional cases.
II. Yes. This is the only way to punish such people who take others' lives or indulge in inhuman activities.
III. Yes. Such severe punishments only will make people refrain from such heinous acts and the society will be safer.
IV. No. Those who are repentant for the crime they committed should be given a chance to improve and lead a normal life.